CIE Division 8 - TC8-03: Survey of Gamut Mapping Papers


Ebner & Fairchild (1997)

The study described in this paper is of particular importance, as it results in experimental data on which gamut clipping can be based. It consisted of a psychophysical experiment designed to "find the perceptually smallest distance from a point in color space to a closed surface of color (gamut boundary)". This was done by having as the originals three kinds of images (abstract [a uniformly coloured square with or without a border], data [a uniformly coloured chart] and figurative [a uniformly coloured cartoon car]) which were coloured with 25 colours from the surface of the original CRT gamut. Observers were then asked to "adjust the color of the image on the left-hand side of the screen to make it look as close as possible to the image on the right-hand side of the screen", whereby the original image was on the right and the left-hand image could only have colours from the simulated reproduction gamut. The reproduction gamut was the gamut obtained by intersecting the gamut of a colour laser printer with that of the CRT. Even though this meant that the gamut shapes of the two media were different, it seems from the figures in this paper that the lightness ranges were made to be equal. As there was no significant difference between the results for the different image types, they were all pooled together for further analysis.

For a given out-of-gamut colour, the experimental results were then modelled by a weighted combination of the following three vectors: (a) constant L* vector, (b) centroid vector (towards L*=50 on the lightness axis) and (c) minimum distance to gamut surface vector at the original colourís hue angle. The experimental results were also compared with the work of Katoh and Ito (1996) and good agreement was found with the coefficients set to (1:2.4:0.6). This result agrees with the findings of Katoh and Ito in as much as it gives least weight to chroma but disagrees with it by claiming that hue needs to be preserved more than lightness. In spite of some differences, these results indicate some maturity in the understanding of gamut clipping and either of the above coefficient sets seem to be good choices for situations where it is sufficient to overcome gamut differences by clipping.
 


Last updated: 17 August 1999 by Jan Morovic